Recognition
Dhāraṇā 80 · Cognition without borders
Whatever knowing or wanting arises in me arises not as a confined event but as all-pervading — contemplating each cognition so, one becomes all-pervading oneself.
The previous dhāraṇā widened the self wholesale. This one is finer-grained: it takes cognitions one at a time — the seeing of a pot, a passing wish — and contests the belief that any of them was ever a small, local event.
The method
The verse chooses the humblest example Indian philosophy owns: ghaṭādau yac ca vijñānam — the cognition of a pot and such — icchādyaṃ vā, or a desire and the like, mama antare, arising within me. Ordinarily each such event seems triply confined: a small knowing, of a small object, inside a small knower. The contemplation reverses the reading: naiva jātaṃ sarvagataṃ — read with the verse's conclusion, it has not arisen as confined; it has arisen as all-pervading. When 'pot' appears, consciousness has taken the pot-shape the way the whole ocean takes the shape of one wave — the entire field of awareness is present in the appearing, not a corner of it. There are no part-time fragments of consciousness; there is only all of it, wearing this shape, now that shape.
The practice, then: at any moment, take the current cognition — whatever is being seen, heard or wanted — and contemplate it as an act of the whole. Bhāvayan iti — contemplating thus — sarvagaḥ: one becomes all-pervading. The knower inherits the width of his knowings the moment they are correctly read.
The smallness was borrowed
Notice the direction of the argument: the verse does not inflate a small cognition into a big one. It denies the smallness was ever real. Confinement is a description laid over the cognition afterwards — by comparison, by ownership, by the pot's own modest size being transferred to the knowing of it. The knowing of a small thing is not a small knowing, just as a mirror reflecting a pebble is not thereby pebble-sized. Strip the borrowed smallness from any single cognition, and the knower discovers there was never a border in the knowing at which he stopped.
घटादौ यच्च विज्ञानमिच्छाद्यं वा ममान्तरे । नैव सर्वगतं जातं भावयन्निति सर्वगः ॥ १०३ ॥
'Whatever cognition of a pot and the like, or desire and so on, arises within me — it has not arisen as confined, but as all-pervading' — contemplating thus, one becomes all-pervading.
'घट आदि का जो ज्ञान, अथवा इच्छा आदि, मेरे भीतर उठता है, वह परिमित नहीं बल्कि सर्वगत (सर्वव्यापक) ही उत्पन्न हुआ है' — ऐसी भावना करता हुआ साधक सर्वगत हो जाता है।